 |
Justice
Davidson Baptist |
Speculation
is rife that high court judge, Justice Davidson Baptiste is being
pulled out of Grenada following complaints levelled against him
to his superiors by the ruling New National Party (NNP) government
of Prime Minister, Dr. Keith Mitchell.
Well-placed legal sources told GRENADA TODAY that the administration
in St. George's has officially written to the Judicial and Legal
Services Commission (JLCS) to complain that the judge is bias
against the government.
According to a legal source, the NNP's letter made mention of
an incident in which Justice Baptiste who is from Dominica decided
to recluse himself from a matter involving government's Legal
Advisor, Hugh Wildman of Jamaica.
About two months ago, the judge in open court decided to withdraw
himself from a case involving Wildman who had publicly accused
him a few days earlier of being bias against him in a judgement.
The stand-off between Justice Baptiste and Wildman was said to
be high on the agenda of a meeting which Prime Minister Mitchell
held a few weeks ago with Acting Chief Justice of the OECS Court,
Brian Alleyne.
This newspaper visited the Judge's Chambers on Tuesday but Justice
Baptiste was not seen on the compound. Legal sources said that
the high court judge who has only been in the country for a matter
of months is expected to be back on the bench by Thursday to deliver
a judgement in a matter involving barrister-at-law, Anslem Clouden.
It is not clear which OECS State that Justice Baptiste might be
transferred to in light of the complaint made against him by the
Mitchell government. The outspoken Clouden has lashed out at the
NNP regime for trying to interfere in the running of the local
judiciary by moving against the high court judge.
"What we are witnessing in the judiciary of the OECS is an
unprecedented level of political interference with the due administration
of Justice", he said. Clouden chided the NNP regime for attacking
Justice Baptiste because for merely "rendering judgements
that are not supportive or in conformity with the government's
position".
It is rather unfortunate, he said that judges have to face up
to these kinds of personal attacks and criticisms from "politicians
and their advisors". In the case of Justice Baptiste, Clouden
said the onslaught against him came directly from Wildman who
accused the judge of being bias in a ruling against him.
Wildman sought to question the legal integrity of the judge by
accusing him of ruling against him merely because the President
of the Grenada Bar Association (GBA), Ruggles Ferguson had took
up his plight of failing to get his monthly salaries on time from
government.
Justice Baptiste is known to have refused to sit in light of consistent
non-payment of his salaries and the matter affecting a high profile
case involving a few visiting regional Queens Counsels According
to Clouden, the attack by Wildman on Justice Baptiste is rather
unprecedented in this jurisdiction.
He said that Wildman created "what in legal circles can best
be described as legal heresy by accusing a sitting judge of being
bias".
Clouden charged the Mitchell government with showing early signs
and warnings after coming into office in mid-1995 of being bent
on trying to control the judiciary.
He recalled the hammering which then high court judge, and current
Acting Chief Justice Brian Alleyne of Dominica received after
ruling against the State in the 20 million E.C dollar Dipcon judgement.
He said that legal action was taken against Alleyne by Wildman
himself who was then an officer of the government.
Clouden made mention of the comments of the Law Lords in England
against Wildman and the NNP regime on the Dipcon matter. He said
the records will show that the Privy Council rebuked the authorities
in Grenada for playing "loose and fast" with the operations
of the local courts and the procedures which govern them.
Clouden also likened the NNP's attack on the judiciary in Grenada
to that of the Robert Mugabe dictatorship in Zimbabwe on the court
system in that African State. He said the Chief Justice in the
Black African republic could no longer stomach "the repeated
incursions" by the government on the independence of the
judiciary" and "resigned and fled to London for safety".
"If we are to have confidence in the ability of our judges
and even the CCJ (Caribbean Court of Justice), we must be assured
by the politicians that they would not resort to tampering and
clandestinely interfering with the due administration of justice.
Clouden urges the political directorate in the region to refrain
from trying to hold "the sword of Damocles" over the
appointment of judicial officers such as the Chief justice and
the President of the CCJ.
This is very important, he said since politicians "are not
eminently qualified" and judicially equipped" to make
such appointments of a judicial nature. Clouden said the apparent
early departure of Justice Baptiste from Grenada "is a striking
example of political manipulation and interference in the judiciary
by the Grenada government.